Wait

If the Bill of Rights is a list of liberties of citizens--at list of things that the national government is forbidden from infringing upon, does not a constitutional amendment against abortion undermine the inherent idea behind the bill of rights? It would restrict the rights of female citizens to have total control over their bodies. Meanwhile, the opposite amendment would provide for the freedom of citizens to choose medical procedures that are in their best interest, and not as dictated by the government. If there's any place we do not need the government to be, it's in the dictation of our values.

Goddammit

If American society is made up of factions to which people feel loyal, and there is no way to eliminate bias, how can there ever be complete political idealism in which we hope that politicians are disinterested and have the best interests of of the public in mind even at times when the public opinion dissents?

It's just silly.




And such a great dream.

Crisis of Meaning

I don't know what to do. I feel an obligation to the people I read about in the New York Times--those in America and those abroad, those who have suffered in great disasters or who simply live in places immensely dangerous and underprivileged. It's difficult to reconcile the American sense of complacency and entitlement and a more altrusitic and human emotion of empathy. The materialism and individualism prevalent in my society is intoxicating and destructive.

What's the use of living for the moment and enjoying life as an individual when there is so much wrong and so much hatred in so many places on earth? Of course, the only answer I can think of is that this is why we are alive--to enjoy it. Otherwise why would we feel any obligation to others, any obligation to help others to enjoy a comfortable life the way we can? It is a goal we all strive to reach, a goal that many need help to reach. But there is no reason for the rest of us who have this within reach to snub it and fall out with society, alienating others with self-righteous clamor for the privileged to give up their lives in respect for those who cannot have the same things? The whole point is to bring a good, environmentally sustainable quality of life to the most people possible.

I suppose that answered a question for me. Because I have an obligation to humans and I can't say how I came up with it. I feel that I should, I need to make a difference in the world during my time on earth, lest my life dry up and my legacy waste away. I do not seek immense recognition, only my own knowledge that I have brought some kind of positive change to the future of mankind. As a self professed pessimist most of the time, I imagine the earth spiraling away into self-destruction and falling far short of its potential.

I can't bear to see it go to waste.

Argument for the civil discussions in Congress to end

Abortion:

Is a woman defying nature by deciding against propagation? After all, the natural goal of all living organisms is to pass on their own genes to the next generation. Are we as humans going against our biological nature in pursuing more lofty goals than the short term effect of bringing another human life into the world? I believe not.

It is in the best interest of the entire world for innovation and invention to continue, as well as the reformation of existing systems and the restoration of ancient systems that are far superior to what exist currently. Study is the most common way for humans today to investigate and look into the future, but what the global society needs today is a vision, a vision towards which it can work. With globally combined brainpower and international effort the earth, as it is led by humans, can really trust that to enter the twenty first century is a greatest threshold it has yet crossed.

Humans have naturally large brains that allow them to percieve their world as something in which they live, something which perpetually affects them, and something that ultimately they have the power to change. Over the past five thousand years, homo sapiens sapiens have inhabited the earth while both terrorizing and cherishing it. Every human civilization from the beginning of time has both given something to the earth, as well as taken away from it, be it due to the tilling of crops, the raping of natural resources, or the impressive inventions that have come to dot the landscape as far away as the Arctic Circle. It would be a waste for humans to either not acknowledge the gift that we have been given--to invent and to wonder--or use the gift to its greatest extent. Unfortunately, up to now, all the things that we have done for the earth have had negative consequences.

Gay Marriage:
How can such a large group of people be against bringing equality to a group of people? The fight to make gay marriage illegal seems only to be a push for a type of segregation, a way of promoting a very specific and close-minded lifestyle. The scariest thing is that so many states have the majority of their populations voting in favor of keeping certain civil rights away from certain people.

I realize that what the far right is trying to do is bring concern over family values to the forefront of political discussion, perhaps in an attempt to offset the discussion of the war in Iraq, and perhaps in an attempt to convince moderates that the direction in which America has been heading in the past ten years is the wrong direction and that the country needs to return to more conservative values in order to preserve heritage and good old morality.